課程資訊
課程名稱
邏輯思考
Critical Thinking Through Logic 
開課學期
110-1 
授課對象
理學院  
授課教師
葉姿伶 
課號
COS5001 
課程識別碼
200 U0010 
班次
01 
學分
1.0 
全/半年
半年 
必/選修
選修 
上課時間
第1,2,3,4,5 週
星期三3,4,5(10:20~13:10) 
上課地點
共301 
備註
本課程中文授課,使用英文教科書。密集課程。
限理學院學生(含輔系、雙修生)
總人數上限:30人 
Ceiba 課程網頁
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1101COS5001_01 
課程簡介影片
 
核心能力關聯
本課程尚未建立核心能力關連
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述

加選本課程序:
學校於9/17會製作完成線上加簽碼,如有意願選修本課的同學,
請寄信給課程教師(wayjiang@ntu.edu.tw)登記,會酌量抽選欲加簽的同學,
屆時會直接寄信給有意願選修的同學。
由於本課為短期密集課程,於第一週即會完成所有加選作業。

Logic is a discipline that examines the rules of thinking and drawing conclusions, or in other words, constructing and evaluating arguments. In our daily lives, both personal and academic, we are surrounded by arguments. These arguments might appear on television, or they might appear within academic research. Because of the ubiquity of arguments, it is important to be able to analyze arguments, avoid faulty conclusions in reasoning, understand levels of meaning and kinds of arguments, avoid verbal pitfalls, understand the steps of scientific methods, and identify value assumptions. Through an understanding and practice of logic, or for many, the concept of critical thinking, students will be able to better handle these challenges.
To help students to achieve this, the purpose of this course is to introduce students to basic logical concepts and rules for logical and ultimately critical thinking. Through the process of developing logical thinking and critical thinking skills, this class will utilize a variety of texts for students to analyze and critique. Reading, specifically reading critically, is an essential part of developing logic and critical thinking skills. Because of this, critical reading is embedded as a foundational component in this class. Class reading materials will serve a variety of specific uses, beginning by illustrating specific examples and facets of logic in both academic and popular settings, and ultimately being used as material for students to analyze and critique. The nature of logic, critical thinking, and debate, mean that students will be developing critical reading skills through this process.
This six-week course will focus on some of the most salient aspects of informal logic. Students can be expected to develop a better awareness of the logical structure of thinking, which can be applied to every field of knowledge. 

課程目標
I. Core Competences (CC)
The purpose of this course is to adhere to the NTU and College of Science educational objectives by contributing to students’
CC 1: Independent judgment and ability to innovate
CC 2: Professional knowledge and skills
CC 3: Communicative and team skills

II. Course Intended Learning Outcome (CILO)
By the end of the course, students should be able to:
CILO 1: distinguish between various types of inductive and deductive arguments (CC 1 & 2)
CILO 2: evaluate the works of their own and their peers on deductive arguments for validity and soundness of (CC 1, 2 & 3)
CILO 3: extract the formal structure of arguments as they occur in ordinary language and evaluate those arguments (CC 1 & 2)
CILO 4: identify the informal fallacies within a reasoning process (CC 1 & 2)
CILO 5: create logical arguments (both inductive and deductive) in their field of study (CC 1 & 2)
CILO 6: Students will be able to develop critical reading skills and apply these skills to generate their own well-formed arguments (CC 1 & 2) 
課程要求
待補 
預期每週課後學習時數
 
Office Hours
另約時間 
指定閱讀
-Designated readings will be provided by the instructor and will involve various articles and excerpts from books and essays.
-Handouts will be provided for each topic.
 
參考書目
Beal, Jc. (2010). Logic: The Basics. London: Routledge.
Browne, M. N., & Keeley, S. M. (2007). Asking the right questions: A guide to critical thinking. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Bowling Green State University.
Caret, C. R., & Hjortland, O. T. (Eds.). (2015). Foundations of Logical Consequence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press
Copi, I. M., Cohen, C., & McMahon, K. (2019). Introduction to Logic. Milton: Routledge.
Hardegree, G. M. (2011). Symbolic logic: A first course. New York: McGraw-Hill/Learning Solutions.
Hospers, J. (1997). An Introduction to Philosophical Analysis. London: Routledge.
Howard-Snyder, F., Howard-Snyder, D., & Wasserman, R. (2020). The power of logic. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Hurley, P. J., & Watson, L. (2018). A concise introduction to logic. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, R. L. (1993). Logic: Deductive, Inductive and Informal Reasoning. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
 
評量方式
(僅供參考)
 
No.
項目
百分比
說明
1. 
Group Assignments 
30% 
 
2. 
Quizzes 
30% 
 
3. 
Final Debate 
30% 
 
4. 
Participation 
10% 
 
 
課程進度
週次
日期
單元主題
第1週
9/22  Logic: Basic Concepts
- critical thinking
- deductive argument
- inductive argument 
第2週
9/29  Identifying Arguments
- Argumentative Forms
- Well Crafted Arguments 
第3週
10/06  Informal Logic: Fallacies
- Fallacies of Irrelevance
- Fallacies Involving Ambiguity
Delivering Logical Arguments
- Oxford Oregon Debate Structure
- Team planning and strategy 
第4週
10/13  Fallacies in the Public Debate
Application of Fallacies in the Research Paper (RP) 
第5週
10/20  Final Debate:
Oregon debate 
第6週
10/27  One-Hour Consultation